MIND: Unified Inquiry and Diagnosis RL with Criteria Grounded Clinical Supports for Psychiatric Consultation
Guoyi Li, Shihao Xu, Jiatong Ma, Yunyun Han, Jianhua Chen, Yafeng Deng

TL;DR
MIND is a reinforcement learning framework that improves psychiatric diagnosis in dialogue systems by grounding inquiries and reasoning in clinical criteria, leading to better accuracy and interpretability.
Contribution
It introduces a Criteria-Grounded Psychiatric Reasoning Bank and a rubric-based supervision method to enhance multi-turn diagnostic reasoning in psychiatric consultations.
Findings
Outperforms baselines in diagnostic accuracy
Enhances empathetic interaction quality
Improves interpretability and generalization
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have advanced medical dialogue systems, yet psychiatric consultation poses substantially higher demands due to subjective ambiguity and comorbidity complexity: an agent must continuously extract psychopathological cues from incomplete and inconsistent patient reports in multi-turn interactions and perform rigorous differential diagnostic reasoning. However, existing methods face two fundamental challenges. First, without criteria-grounded clinical supports, they are prone to unsupported clinical assertions when symptoms are atypical or underspecified. Second, in multi-turn interactions, they struggle to mitigate inquiry drift (off-topic or low-yield questioning) and optimize questioning strategies. To address these challenges, we propose MIND, a unified inquiry--diagnosis reinforcement learning framework for psychiatric consultation. Specifically, we build a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Healthcare · Topic Modeling · Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
