The Effect of Different Methods for Accounting for $\alpha$-enhancement on the Asteroseismic Modeling of Metal-Poor Stars
Christopher J. Lindsay, J. M. Joel Ong, Sarbani Basu, Samuel Grunblatt, and Marc Hon

TL;DR
This study compares different methods of accounting for $\
Contribution
It demonstrates that detailed $\
Findings
Stellar properties are consistent across $\
Uncertainties in stellar parameters are comparable between methods.
The $ u_{ ext{max}}$ scaling relation breaks down at low metallicities.
Abstract
Constraining stellar models using asteroseismic and spectroscopic observations is a powerful method for precisely determining the fundamental properties of stars in different kinematic components of our galaxy. We use spectroscopy and individual oscillation mode frequencies to perform a homogeneous modeling study of eight evolved metal-poor stars enhanced in -elements. We compare a full treatment of -enhancement against an ad hoc correction to the total metallicity and show that the stellar properties inferred from asteroseismic modeling using both sets of models agree with each other. Additionally, we find that the uncertainties on stellar parameters derived from the both -enhanced modeling methods are comparable. This is in qualitative disagreement with existing works showing red-giant ages constrained by only the global asteroseismic parameters to depend…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
