CHEX-MATE: Are we getting cluster thermodynamics right?

TL;DR

This study evaluates the accuracy of current X-ray analysis techniques in measuring galaxy cluster thermodynamic properties using realistic simulations, highlighting robust density and gas mass recovery but challenges in temperature profile measurements.

Contribution

Developed dedicated end-to-end simulations and analysis pipeline to assess the reliability of X-ray measurements of cluster thermodynamics, revealing strengths and limitations.

Findings

Gas density profiles are accurately recovered within 10%.

Gas mass is measured with better than 1% accuracy.

Temperature profiles are more biased and challenging to measure reliably.

Abstract

Galaxy clusters offer powerful insights into the large-scale structure of the Universe and the physics of baryons in hot state. Their scientific exploitation, however, hinges on our ability to accurately measure key thermodynamic properties. In this work, we aim to assess the reliability of current analysis techniques in reconstructing these properties, with particular focus on samples similar to those observed in the Cluster HEritage project with XMM-Newton (CHEX-MATE). We develop a suite of dedicated end-to-end simulations of CHEX-MATE-like clusters selected from large scale hydrodynamical simulations, and processed through a newly developed realistic XMM-Newton simulator. We apply a full X-ray data analysis pipeline to the mock datasets, including imaging, spectral fitting, and profile reconstruction. The gas density profiles can be robustly recovered across a wide radial range, when using azimuthal mean surface brightness profiles. Our reconstruction techniques are able to reproduce the intrinsic density profile with the correct scatter, with deviations of at most 10% between 0.1 and 1xR500c. The gas mass is reconstructed with better than 1% accuracy. Accurate measurement of temperature profiles is more challenging and possibly subject to biases, particularly in the presence of azimuthal variations and multi-temperature gas along the line of sight, which dominate over projection effects. Our results highlight the need for caution in interpreting cluster temperature measurements and underscore the value of tailored mock observations for understanding observational systematics. These findings also suggest that biases in X-ray temperature measurements may alter the interpretation of the thermodynamical state of the intra-cluster medium, an outlook particularly relevant in light of recent low velocity measurements from the XRISM mission.