RADAR: Learning to Route with Asymmetry-aware DistAnce Representations
Hang Yi, Ziwei Huang, Yining Ma, Zhiguang Cao

TL;DR
RADAR introduces a scalable neural framework that effectively encodes asymmetric distance matrices in vehicle routing problems, improving generalization and performance on real-world asymmetric scenarios.
Contribution
It proposes a novel SVD-based initialization and Sinkhorn normalization to handle asymmetry, enhancing neural VRP solvers' scalability and accuracy.
Findings
RADAR outperforms baseline models on synthetic and real-world benchmarks.
It demonstrates strong generalization to out-of-distribution instances.
The approach effectively encodes static and dynamic asymmetry in VRPs.
Abstract
Recent neural solvers have achieved strong performance on vehicle routing problems (VRPs), yet they mainly assume symmetric Euclidean distances, restricting applicability to real-world scenarios. A core challenge is encoding the relational features in asymmetric distance matrices of VRPs. Early attempts directly encoded these matrices but often failed to produce compact embeddings and generalized poorly at scale. In this paper, we propose RADAR, a scalable neural framework that augments existing neural VRP solvers with the ability to handle asymmetric inputs. RADAR addresses asymmetry from both static and dynamic perspectives. It leverages Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) on the asymmetric distance matrix to initialize compact and generalizable embeddings that inherently encode the static asymmetry in the inbound and outbound costs of each node. To further model dynamic asymmetry in…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
1. The paper is well-written, and the methodology is explained clearly. 2. The conceptual framing of the problem into "static" and "dynamic" asymmetry is interesting, providing a new perspective for addressing asymmetric routing problems. 3. The experimental evaluation is a major strength. It is comprehensive, rigorous, and includes a wide array of benchmarks 4. The empirical evaluation showcases the strong performance of the RADAR compared to the SOTA baseline, especially in out-of-distrib
1. The paper's contribution lies in the clever application of existing techniques rather than the development of fundamentally new methods. Both SVD and Sinkhorn normalization are standard, well-established algorithms. While the engineering is solid, the work feels more incremental than transformative from a methodological standpoint. 2. In Table 1, the authors state that all retrained baselines were evaluated using z-score normalization. However, the authors do not justify why this specific no
- s1. two simple ideas: using left and right eigenvectors for asymmetric distances and making attention doubly stochastic. - s2. many experiments, also some on different problem variations. - s3. well written.
- w1. ablation study and thus the attribution of improvement to the two ideas is not fully clear. - w2. performance of OR heuristics is not fully clear. - w3. why the performance improvements are so much larger for larger problems or out of distribution problems is not investigated. - w4. small methodological contribution: adding the eigenvectors is basically feature engineering the asymmetric distance matrix characteristics of the problem. more details: w1. ablation study and thus the at
1. The SVD-based embedding is simple yet empirically effective. The motivation is clearly articulated and technically convincing. 2. The paper presents extensive experiments across multiple datasets and VRP variants, providing solid empirical support for the method’s effectiveness.
While leveraging SVD to encode matrix asymmetry is a valuable idea, the current contribution is confined to routing problems. Asymmetric (Directed) edge structures widely exist in other graph-based combinatorial optimization tasks. This scope limitation reduces the broader impact and significance of the work. If the authors could extend the idea from routing distance asymmetry to general graph asymmetry and validate it on a more diverse set of problems, the contribution would be substantially st
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVehicle Routing Optimization Methods · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
