Breaking the Prototype Bias Loop: Confidence-Aware Federated Contrastive Learning for Highly Imbalanced Clients
Tian-Shuang Wu, Shen-Huan Lyu, Ning Chen, Yi-Xiao He, Bing Tang, Baoliu Ye, Qingfu Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces CAFedCL, a federated contrastive learning framework that mitigates prototype bias caused by class imbalance and heterogeneity, improving accuracy and fairness across clients.
Contribution
The paper proposes a confidence-aware aggregation method and augmentation techniques to reduce prototype bias and enhance convergence in federated contrastive learning.
Findings
Outperforms baseline methods in accuracy under class imbalance.
Reduces prototype drift and improves convergence stability.
Enhances client fairness in federated learning scenarios.
Abstract
Local class imbalance and data heterogeneity across clients often trap prototype-based federated contrastive learning in a prototype bias loop: biased local prototypes induced by imbalanced data are aggregated into biased global prototypes, which are repeatedly reused as contrastive anchors, accumulating errors across communication rounds. To break this loop, we propose Confidence-Aware Federated Contrastive Learning (CAFedCL), a novel framework that improves the prototype aggregation mechanism and strengthens the contrastive alignment guided by prototypes. CAFedCL employs a confidence-aware aggregation mechanism that leverages predictive uncertainty to downweight high-variance local prototypes. In addition, generative augmentation for minority classes and geometric consistency regularization are integrated to stabilize the structure between classes. From a theoretical perspective, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
