Gaia DR3 high radial velocity stars: Genuine fast-moving objects or outliers?
D. Katz, A. G\'omez, E. Caffau, P. Bonifacio, C. Hottier, O. Vanel, C. Soubiran, P. Panuzzo, D. Chosson, P. Sartoretti, R. Lallement, P. Di Matteo, M. Haywood, N. Robichon, S. Baker, A. Barbier, D. Bashi, K. Benson, R. Blomme, N. Brouillet, L. Casamiquella, L. Chemin, M. Cropper

TL;DR
This study assesses the authenticity of high radial velocity stars in Gaia DR3, confirming some as genuine and identifying others as spurious, revealing their likely accreted origins and relation to past galactic merging events.
Contribution
It provides a validation of Gaia DR3 high radial velocity measurements and analyzes the properties and origins of these stars, highlighting the prevalence of spurious data at low S/N.
Findings
Ground-based measurements confirmed 104 of 134 Gaia HRV stars.
Spurious radial velocities are more common at lower S/N and extreme velocities.
Most genuine HRV stars are likely accreted and associated with past merging structures.
Abstract
The third Gaia data release includes 33.8 million radial velocity measurements, extending to a magnitude of G_RVS = 14. To reach this magnitude limit, spectra were processed down to a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of 2. In this very low S/N regime, noise-induced peaks in the cross-correlation function can result in spurious radial velocity determinations. Quality filters were applied to the dataset to mitigate such artefacts as much as possible prior to publication. Nevertheless, the high radial velocity (HRV) stars -- defined here as those with radial velocities below -500 or above +500 km/s -- are so sparsely populated that even a few hundred spurious measurements can lead to significant contamination. The objectives of the present study are as follows: (i) to confirm or refute the radial velocity values of the order of one hundred Gaia DR3 HRV stars, (ii) to evaluate the rate of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Scientific Research and Discoveries
