Low-Degree Method Fails to Predict Robust Subspace Recovery
He Jia, Aravindan Vijayaraghavan

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the low-degree polynomial framework fails to predict the computational complexity of a specific robust subspace recovery problem, highlighting limitations in its universality for certain high-dimensional tasks.
Contribution
It introduces a natural hypothesis testing problem where low-degree methods fail, yet a simple polynomial-time algorithm exists, challenging the low-degree conjecture's predictive power.
Findings
Low-degree moments match up to degree O(√(log n)/log log n).
The problem is polynomial-time solvable but not predicted by low-degree methods.
The results challenge the universality of low-degree methods in predicting computational hardness.
Abstract
The low-degree polynomial framework has been highly successful in predicting computational versus statistical gaps for high-dimensional problems in average-case analysis and machine learning. This success has led to the low-degree conjecture, which posits that this method captures the power and limitations of efficient algorithms for a wide class of high-dimensional statistical problems. We identify a natural and basic hypothesis testing problem in which is polynomial time solvable, but for which the low-degree polynomial method fails to predict its computational tractability even up to degree . Moreover, the low-degree moments match exactly up to degree . Our problem is a special case of the well-studied robust subspace recovery problem. The lower bounds suggest that there is no polynomial time algorithm for this problem.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
