Human-Certified Module Repositories for the AI Age
Szil\'ard Enyedi

TL;DR
This paper introduces Human-Certified Module Repositories (HCMRs), a new framework for creating trustworthy, curated, and provenance-rich software modules to ensure reliability in AI-assisted development.
Contribution
It proposes the HCMRs framework combining human oversight and automated analysis for certifying modules and supporting safe assembly in AI-driven software workflows.
Findings
HCMRs provide a structured approach for module certification and provenance tracking.
Analysis of threat surfaces highlights risks in modular ecosystems.
Lessons from recent failures inform the HCMRs design and governance.
Abstract
Human-Certified Module Repositories (HCMRs) are introduced in this work as a new architectural model for constructing trustworthy software in the era of AI-assisted development. As large language models increasingly participate in code generation, configuration synthesis, and multi-component integration, the reliability of AI-assembled systems will depend critically on the trustworthiness of the building blocks they use. Today's software supply-chain incidents and modular development ecosystems highlight the risks of relying on components with unclear provenance, insufficient review, or unpredictable composition behavior. We argue that future AI-driven development workflows require repositories of reusable modules that are curated, security-reviewed, provenance-rich, and equipped with explicit interface contracts. To this end, we propose HCMRs, a framework that blends human oversight…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Computing and Data Management · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
