
TL;DR
This paper explores how AI systems can represent and realize different types of uncertainty, including epistemic and subjective, using various architectures and conceptual frameworks.
Contribution
It introduces a novel perspective that some uncertainty states are interrogative attitudes, framing uncertainty as questions rather than propositions.
Findings
Different architectures accommodate uncertainty in distinct ways
Distinction between epistemic and subjective uncertainty clarified
Uncertainty states can be viewed as interrogative attitudes
Abstract
The paper investigates whether and how AI systems can realize states of uncertainty. By adopting a functionalist and behavioral perspective, it examines how symbolic, connectionist and hybrid architectures make room for uncertainty. The paper distinguishes between epistemic uncertainty, or uncertainty inherent in the data or information, and subjective uncertainty, or the system's own attitude of being uncertain. It further distinguishes between distributed and discrete realizations of subjective uncertainty. A key contribution is the idea that some states of uncertainty are interrogative attitudes whose content is a question rather than a proposition.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
