Preconditioned Flow Matching
Shadab Ahamed, Eshed Gal, Md Shahriar Rahim Siddiqui, Simon Ghyselincks, Moshe Eliasof, Eldad Haber

TL;DR
This paper identifies a geometric bottleneck in flow matching due to ill-conditioned covariances and proposes preconditioned flow matching to improve training stability and sample quality across various datasets.
Contribution
It introduces a preconditioning framework that transforms target distributions to enhance the conditioning of flow matching, supported by theoretical analysis and empirical results.
Findings
Preconditioning improves flow matching convergence and sample quality.
The method enhances metrics like FID, MMD, precision, and recall.
Preconditioning benefits are not solely due to additional parameters, but improved geometry.
Abstract
Flow matching (FM) learns vector fields by regressing stochastic velocity targets along intermediate distributions . We identify a geometric optimization bottleneck in this regression problem: when the covariance of is ill-conditioned, gradient-based training rapidly fits high-variance directions while making slow progress along low-variance ones. In an exactly solvable Gaussian setting, we prove that the excess risk is weighted by , and that both gradient descent and stochastic gradient descent inherit condition-number-dependent convergence. We then extend the analysis to Gaussian mixtures, showing that multimodality does not average away this effect; instead, the slowest and worst-conditioned component can control optimization. Motivated by this analysis, we propose \emph{preconditioned flow matching}, a precondition-then-match framework that transforms…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
