The ALMA Survey of Gas Evolution of PROtoplanetary Disks (AGE-PRO): Constraints on disk turbulence, fragmentation velocity, and inner pebble fluxes
Lilian Luo, Paola Pinilla, Camila Pulgar\'es, Laura M. P\'erez, Miguel Vioque, Nicol\'as T. Kurtovic, Anibal Sierra, Carolina Agurto-Gangas, Rossella Anania, John Carpenter, Lucas A. Cieza, Dingshan Deng, James Miley, Ilaria Pascucci, Giovanni P. Rosotti, Beno\^it Tabone

TL;DR
This study models dust evolution in 30 protoplanetary disks using ALMA data to constrain turbulence, fragmentation velocity, and pebble fluxes, revealing that low turbulence and fragmentation best fit many disks.
Contribution
It applies tailored dust evolution models to a diverse disk sample, incorporating substructures and pressure traps, to better understand dust transport and disk evolution.
Findings
Nearly half of the disks are best fit by low turbulence and low fragmentation velocity models.
Models of smooth disks underpredict dust mass, suggesting unresolved substructures.
Pebble fluxes into inner regions correlate more with disk age than substructure presence.
Abstract
How substructures and disk properties affect dust evolution and the delivery of solids and volatiles into planet-forming regions remains an open question. We present results from tailored dust evolution modeling of the AGE-PRO ALMA large program, a sample of 30 protoplanetary disks spanning different evolutionary stages. Visibility fitting of the AGE-PRO ALMA data (at 1.3\,mm) reveals that approximately half of the disks exhibit radial substructures. Combined with stellar properties, disk inclinations, and gas mass estimates from CO isotopologues and NH, this well-characterized set of disks provides an ideal testbed to constrain dust evolution models across different ages and disk morphologies. Using the dust evolution code \texttt{DustPy}, we simulate dust evolution in each disk under four model configurations, varying two key free parameters: the turbulent viscosity ($\alpha =…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
