On-surface synthesis and aromaticity of large cyclocarbons
Lisanne Sellies, Marco Vitek, Yueze Gao, Fabian Paschke, Florian Albrecht, Jakob Eckrich, Beren Dempsey, Stefano Barison, Leonard-Alexander Lieske, Samuele Piccinelli, Alberto Baiardi, Ivano Tavernelli, Harry L. Anderson, Igor Ron\v{c}evi\'c, Leo Gross

TL;DR
This study synthesized large cyclocarbons up to 88 atoms, measured their aromaticity via transport gaps, and confirmed theoretical predictions about their aromatic behavior and potential applications in quantum electronics.
Contribution
The paper reports the first synthesis and experimental analysis of large cyclocarbons with up to 88 atoms, validating theoretical models of aromaticity at this scale.
Findings
Transport gaps oscillate with N, confirming aromaticity for N=42.
Aromaticity persists at N=42, with ring currents comparable to benzene.
Larger cyclocarbons show diminishing oscillation, indicating non-aromaticity at very large sizes.
Abstract
Molecular rings of N carbon atoms, that is, cyclo[N]carbons, or C, can be formed by tip-induced chemistry [1-7]. Because of their monocyclic geometry, cyclocarbons are fundamentally important for testing theoretical models of aromaticity [8-11]. Here, we synthesized large cyclo[N]carbons, with N up to 88, by tip-induced chemistry on a NaCl surface and studied their aromaticity by measuring their transport gaps by scanning tunnelling spectroscopy. We first generated C and C, and then fused multiple cyclocarbons [5-7] by means of atom manipulation, obtaining C, C, C, C and C. In agreement with predictions obtained using a finely tuned density functional [12-15] and large active space approximate configuration interaction calculations executed on quantum hardware [16, 17], we observe a substantially smaller transport gap for C (N…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
