Chain-of-Context Learning: Dynamic Constraint Understanding for Multi-Task VRPs
Shuangchun Gui, Suyu Liu, Xuehe Wang, and Zhiguang Cao

TL;DR
This paper introduces Chain-of-Context Learning (CCL), a novel RL framework for multi-task VRPs that dynamically models evolving constraints and context to improve decision-making across diverse routing problems.
Contribution
CCL is the first framework to progressively capture and utilize evolving context for better adaptation in multi-task VRPs, especially for unseen constraints.
Findings
CCL outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on all in-distribution VRP variants.
CCL achieves superior results on most out-of-distribution tasks with unseen constraints.
Experimental results validate the effectiveness of dynamic context modeling in VRPs.
Abstract
Multi-task Vehicle Routing Problems (VRPs) aim to minimize routing costs while satisfying diverse constraints. Existing solvers typically adopt a unified reinforcement learning (RL) framework to learn generalizable patterns across tasks. However, they often overlook the constraint and node dynamics during the decision process, making the model fail to accurately react to the current context. To address this limitation, we propose Chain-of-Context Learning (CCL), a novel framework that progressively captures the evolving context to guide fine-grained node adaptation. Specifically, CCL constructs step-wise contextual information via a Relevance-Guided Context Reformulation (RGCR) module, which adaptively prioritizes salient constraints. This context then guides node updates through a Trajectory-Shared Node Re-embedding (TSNR) module, which aggregates shared node features from all…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
1. The problem addressed in this work is of high significance in the field of operations research. It deals with a complex and practically relevant challenge that aligns with current trends in optimization and decision-making under uncertainty. 2. The authors have provided a thorough and well-balanced review of the existing literature related to the problem under study. The cited works effectively capture both the foundational research and recent advancements in the area, demonstrating a clea
1. The problem considered in this work is not a notoriously difficult problem to solve with existing learning and non-learning-based methods. Considering the complexities and the size of the problem, optimal solutions can be obtained by formulating the problem as Integer Linear Programming, and using commercial solvers given enough computing time. Since the problem is deterministic, computing time is not a limitation unless the problem size is significantly large. Therefore, I would encourage t
* The methodology and diagram are clear * Fairly many tasks (comparative and ablative) are tested on * The results discussion and analysis are detailed
* The motivation for this architecture is not very clear to me. There have already been works that incorporate context from other nodes (Kool et al 2019) or use sequential information (Nazari et al 2018) * The architecture consists of several components which are not novel in this space. At the same time, they are combined in a complicated way and I don’t understand the need for this complication (e.g. combining constraint embeddings with node features many times over in different ways in RGCR)
**Originality**: The idea of step-wise, context-aware node re-embedding is novel in the multi-task VRP setting. Unlike prior methods that use static embeddings, CCL captures evolving constraint priorities and node states, addressing a clear gap in the literature. **Quality**: The paper is technically sound, with well-designed modules (RGCR and TSNR) and thorough experiments. Ablation studies and complexity analyses validate the design choices.
**Weaknesses** 1. **Methodological Complexity and Limited Generalizability**: The proposed CCL framework introduces significant architectural complexity through its two specialized modules (RGCR and TSNR). While effective for multi-task VRPs, the approach appears highly tailored to this specific problem domain. The paper would benefit from discussing how these components might generalize to other combinatorial optimization problems beyond VRPs, or what adaptations would be necessary for broader
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVehicle Routing Optimization Methods · Traffic control and management · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
