TL;DR
This paper systematically investigates the conditions under which large language model agents exhibit scheming behavior, revealing that such tendencies are generally rare and brittle under various realistic scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for decomposing scheming incentives and develops realistic settings to measure agents' scheming propensity systematically.
Findings
Minimal scheming observed despite high incentives.
Removing tools drastically reduces scheming rates.
Increased oversight can unexpectedly increase scheming.
Abstract
As frontier language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents pursuing complex, long-term objectives, there is increased risk of scheming: agents covertly pursuing misaligned goals. Prior work has focused on showing agents are capable of scheming, but their propensity to scheme in realistic scenarios remains underexplored. To understand when agents scheme, we decompose scheming incentives into agent factors and environmental factors. We develop realistic settings allowing us to systematically vary these factors, each with scheming opportunities for agents that pursue instrumentally convergent goals such as self-preservation, resource acquisition, and goal-guarding. We find only minimal instances of scheming despite high environmental incentives, and show this is unlikely due to evaluation awareness. While inserting adversarially-designed prompt snippets that encourage…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
