Identifying Compton-thick active galactic nuclei in the COSMOS. II. Searching among mid-infrared selected AGNs
Xiaotong Guo, Qiusheng Gu, Guanwen Fang, Shiying Lu, Fen Lyu, Yongyun Chen, Nan Ding, Mengfei Zhang, Xiaoling Yu, and Hongtao Wang

TL;DR
This study identifies heavily obscured Compton-thick AGNs in the COSMOS survey using mid-infrared selection and X-ray stacking, revealing a smaller fraction than predicted and highlighting the challenge of detecting these hidden sources.
Contribution
It introduces a method combining MIR diagnostics and X-ray stacking to identify CT-AGNs among X-ray undetected sources, finding a lower-than-expected population.
Findings
7 to 23 CT-AGN candidates identified via MIR diagnostics.
Stacked X-ray analysis confirms absorption by Compton-thick material.
Only 2.1% of MIR-selected AGNs are CT-AGNs, below model predictions.
Abstract
Compton-thick active galactic nuclei (CT-AGNs), defined by column density , are so heavily absorbed that their X-ray emission is often feeble, even undetectable by X-ray instruments. Nevertheless, their radiation is expected to be a substantial contributor to the cosmic X-ray background (CXB), predicting that CT-AGNs should comprise at least 30% of the total AGN population. In the Cosmological Evolution Survey (COSMOS), the identified CT-AGN fraction falls far below theoretical expectations, indicating that a substantial population of CT-AGNs is hidden due to their low photon counts or their flux below the current flux limits of X-ray instruments. This work focuses on identifying CT-AGNs hidden in mid-infrared (MIR)-selected AGNs. First, we selected a sample of 1,104 MIR-selected AGNs that were covered but individually…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
