A New Look at the Visual Performance of Nonparametric Hazard Rate Estimators
Olaf Gefeller, Nils Lid Hjort

TL;DR
This paper adapts visual error criteria from density estimation to hazard rate estimation with censored data, providing insights into when these new criteria differ from traditional methods.
Contribution
It extends the visual error criteria to hazard rate estimation, offering a new perspective on evaluating nonparametric hazard estimators.
Findings
Derived results on the applicability of visual error criteria to hazard rate estimation
Identified conditions where visual criteria differ from conventional evaluation methods
Enhanced understanding of estimator performance in censored data contexts
Abstract
Nonparametric curve estimation by kernel methods has attracted widespread interest in theoretical and applied statistics. One area of conflict between theory and application relates to the evaluation of the performance of the estimators. Recently, Marron and Tsybakov (1995) proposed {\it visual error criteria} for addressing this issue of controversy in density estimation. Their core idea consists in using integrated alternatives to the Hausdorff distance for measuring the closeness of two sets based onthe Euclidean distance. In this paper, we transfer these ideas to hazard rate estimation from censored data. We are able to derive similar results that help to understand when the application of the new criteria will lead to answers that differ from those given by the conventional approaches.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
