From Syntax to Semantics: Geometric Stability as the Missing Axis of Perturbation Biology
Prashant C. Raju

TL;DR
This paper introduces geometric stability as a new metric to evaluate cellular responses to perturbations, capturing stability and coherence in high-dimensional state spaces beyond traditional measures.
Contribution
It proposes a novel geometric stability framework based on Waddington's landscape to assess cellular intervention outcomes, revealing hidden regulatory structures.
Findings
Geometric stability distinguishes stable from unstable cellular states.
It captures regulatory architecture invisible to conventional metrics.
It discriminates master regulators from lineage-specific factors without prior annotation.
Abstract
The capacity to precisely edit genomes has outpaced our ability to predict the consequences. A cell can be genetically perfect and therapeutically useless: edited exactly as intended, yet unstable, drifting toward unintended fates, or selected for properties that compromise safety. This paradox reflects a deeper gap in how we evaluate biological intervention. Current frameworks excel at measuring what was done to a cell but remain blind to what the cell has become. We argue that this blindness stems from treating cells as collections of independent variables rather than as dynamical systems occupying positions on high-dimensional state manifolds. Drawing on Waddington's epigenetic landscape, we propose geometric stability as a missing axis of evaluation: the directional coherence of cellular responses to perturbation. This metric distinguishes interventions that guide cells coherently…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
