Enhanced Hydrogen Electrolyzer with Integrated Energy Storage to Provide Grid-Forming Services for Off-Grid ReP2H Application

TL;DR

This paper introduces an integrated energy storage-enhanced hydrogen electrolyzer system that provides grid-forming services for off-grid renewable power-to-hydrogen applications, improving efficiency and reducing costs through novel control strategies and direct battery integration.

Contribution

It presents a new electrolyzer topology with integrated batteries and tailored control strategies for autonomous grid support in off-grid ReP2H systems, enhancing efficiency and reducing costs.

Findings

Energy efficiency increased by 0.23%

Initial cost reduced by approximately 6%

Validated through real-time simulations

Abstract

This article proposes an energy storage-enhanced hydrogen electrolyzer (ESEHE) to provide grid-forming (GFM) services for off-grid renewable power to hydrogen (ReP2H) systems. Unlike conventional ReP2H systems that use a centralized energy storage (ES) plant, the proposed topology directly connects batteries to the DC buses of electrolysis rectifiers. A tailored virtual synchronous machine (VSM) control framework enables the electrolyzer to autonomously provide real and reactive power support. A coordinated frequency-splitting energy extraction strategy is designed to exploit both the battery and the electrolysis stack's electrical double-layer (EDL) effect on different timescales, maximizing active power support while mitigating battery and stack degradation. An adaptive equalization control strategy is further developed to balance the battery state of charge (SOC) among multiple ESEHEs operating in parallel, which optimizes energy distribution and extends battery life. Real-time simulations on StarSim validate the proposed topology and control strategies. Techno-economic analysis shows that, compared with conventional off-grid ReP2H systems based on a centralized ES plant, the ESEHE improves overall energy efficiency by 0.23% and reduces the initial total converter investment cost by roughly 6%, mainly due to the elimination of bidirectional AC/DC conversion and its associated losses in the centralized ES plant.