An example of regional seismicity recovery on June 22, 2020, using waveform cross-correlation
Ivan Kitov

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates how waveform cross-correlation techniques can recover and identify seismic events, including potential clandestine nuclear tests, that were previously undetected by standard monitoring systems.
Contribution
It introduces an improved waveform cross-correlation method for seismic event detection, enabling retrospective analysis of data to identify missed or hidden events.
Findings
Recovered seismic signals from June 22, 2020, using WCC
Identified previously undetected seismic events
Enhanced detection thresholds for nuclear test monitoring
Abstract
June 22nd, 2020 was an important day for nuclear test monitoring. The US undersecretary, Thomas DiNanno, made an official claim that a secret nuclear test was conducted at the Lop Nor testing site on that day. However, the Provisional Technical Secretariat (PTS) of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) reported that there were no seismic events consistent with a nuclear explosion on that date. This means that the event was either hidden under the threshold of the international monitoring system (IMS), or it was missed by the international data center (IDC). Alternatively, no event occurred. All scenarios are of interest to the scientific community. The routine processing of seismic data by the IDC is well documented in open sources. The threshold for detection is not uniform across the globe, especially in continental areas. Additionally, it is not low enough to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHigh-pressure geophysics and materials · earthquake and tectonic studies · Seismic Waves and Analysis
