Reasoning-Driven Multimodal LLM for Domain Generalization
Zhipeng Xu, Zilong Wang, Xinyang Jiang, Dongsheng Li, De Cheng, Nannan Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a reasoning-driven approach using multimodal large language models to improve domain generalization in deep learning, leveraging reasoning chains for more robust predictions under domain shifts.
Contribution
It proposes RD-MLDG, a novel framework combining reasoning supervision and regularization to enhance out-of-domain generalization in multimodal models.
Findings
Achieves state-of-the-art results on DomainBed datasets.
Demonstrates the effectiveness of reasoning chains in domain generalization.
Addresses challenges in fine-tuning reasoning-based models.
Abstract
This paper addresses the domain generalization (DG) problem in deep learning. While most DG methods focus on enforcing visual feature invariance, we leverage the reasoning capability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and explore the potential of constructing reasoning chains that derives image categories to achieve more robust predictions under domain shift. To this end, we systematically study the role of reasoning in DG using DomainBed-Reasoning, a newly constructed extension of DomainBed dataset, in which each sample is paired with class-relevant reasoning chains. Our analysis reveals two key challenges: (i) fine-tuning MLLMs with reasoning chains for classification is more challenging than direct label supervision, since the model must optimize complex reasoning sequences before label prediction; and (ii) mismatches in reasoning patterns between supervision signals and…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
1. The paper addresses domain generalization by proposing a novel approach that leverages the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models, which is a challenging and practical scenario. 2. The paper is well written and easy to follow. 3. The paper provides extensive experiments, showing the effectiveness and versatility of the proposed method.
1. The quality of the entire DomainBed-Reasoning dataset influences on reasoning chains generated by GPT-4o. This introduces a potential dependency and bias. 2. The proposed training procedure appears computationally intensive. It involves an initial MTCT stage followed by N=3 rounds of SARR. Each SARR round seems to require a full generation pass over the source data, a filtering step, and another fine-tuning stage.
1. The work connects reasoning in MLLMs with robustness under domain shift, introducing a conceptually novel direction -- process-level invariance -- that goes beyond traditional feature-invariance approaches. 2. DomainBed-Reasoning is a non-trivial extension with structured reasoning chains, multi-stage generation, and rejection sampling to ensure coherence. This dataset can serve as a testbed for future studies on reasoning-based generalization. 3. RD-MLDG addresses two empirically observed
1. DomainBed-Reasoning relies entirely on GPT-4o-generated reasoning chains. These synthetic sequences likely encode stylistic and distributional priors from GPT-4o’s pretraining, rather than domain-grounded reasoning. As a result, RD-MLDG might learn to imitate linguistic style alignment rather than to capture transferable causal or process-level invariances. While the dataset is well-constructed, it remains uncertain whether the performance gains derive from genuine reasoning integration or fr
* **Clear problem identification and analysis:** The authors systematically diagnose optimization and reasoning-pattern gaps through quantitative studies (e.g., token probability and entropy analysis). * **(Minor) Dataset contribution:** DomainBed-Reasoning provides a useful benchmark for reasoning-based domain generalization and may foster further research, even if its construction is relatively straightforward.
* **Limited methodological novelty:** The distinction between MTCT and SARR losses is unclear, as they appear almost identical. In particular, the novelty of SARR seems limited, resembling a form of rejection sampling. * **Evaluation scope:** The experiments focus mainly on visual classification tasks; it remains unclear whether reasoning-driven DG generalizes to other multimodal tasks (e.g., VQA, image-text retrieval). * **Baseline coverage:** Comparisons are mainly against non-MLLM DG methods,
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMultimodal Machine Learning Applications · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Topic Modeling
