Automated Dose-Based Anatomic Region Classification of Radiotherapy Treatment for Big Data Applications

TL;DR

This paper presents an automated, deep-learning-based software tool that accurately classifies radiotherapy treatment plans into anatomical regions using dose-volume data, facilitating large-scale data analysis.

Contribution

The study introduces a novel dose-overlap based algorithm that automates anatomic region classification, reducing reliance on inconsistent metadata in multi-institutional radiotherapy datasets.

Findings

Achieved 91% exact accuracy in classification

Attained 94% top-2 accuracy for primary and secondary labels

Demonstrated high robustness on clinical plans

Abstract

Curation is a significant barrier to using 'big data' radiotherapy planning databases of 100,000+ patients. Anatomic site stratification is essential for downstream analyses, but current methods rely on inconsistent plan labels or target nomenclature, which is unreliable for multi-institutional data. We developed software to automate labeling by inferring anatomic regions directly from dose-volume overlap with deep-learning segmentations, eliminating metadata reliance. The software processes DICOM files in bulk, utilizing deep learning to segment 118 structures (organs, glands, and bones) categorized into six regions: Cranial, Head and Neck, Pelvis, Abdomen, Thorax, Extremity. The 85% and 50% isodose lines are converted to structures to compute organ-specific dose-overlap metrics. Plans are assigned ranked regional labels based on these intersections. The algorithm was refined using 109 expert-labeled cases and validated on 100 consecutive clinical plans. On the 100-plan test dataset, the algorithm achieved 91% Exact Accuracy (matching all expert labels and order), 94% Top-2 Accuracy (matching the top two expert regions regardless of order), and 95% Top-1 Accuracy (matching the primary expert label). The automated workflow demonstrated high accuracy and robustness. The 95% Top-1 Accuracy is particularly significant, as it enables reliable querying of plans based on the primary treatment site. Detailed analysis of the few mismatched cases showed most were treated areas at the border between anatomic regions and were ambiguous between these two regions in a common-sense interpretation. This algorithm provides a scalable, standardized solution for curating the large, multi-institutional datasets required for 'big data' in radiotherapy and provides an important complement to text-based approaches.