Mathematical Paradoxes of Dirac Equation Representations
V.P.Neznamov

TL;DR
This paper analyzes different mathematical representations of the Dirac equation, identifying paradoxes and proposing that using only positive energy states resolves these issues in quantum electrodynamics.
Contribution
It uncovers mathematical paradoxes in Dirac equation representations and suggests a resolution by restricting to positive energy amplitude states.
Findings
Mathematical artifacts contradict physical premises
Paradoxes are resolved with positive energy states
Analysis covers perturbative and nonperturbative QED
Abstract
This paper examines the Foldy-Wouthuysen and Feynman-Gell-Mann representations of the Dirac equation. The analysis is conducted for electrons and positrons interacting with electromagnetic fields. Versions of quantum electrodynamics are considered both within the scope of perturbation theory and in the nonperturbative case with strong electromagnetic fields. Mathematical artifacts that contradicting the physical premises of the theory are identified in the studied representations of the Dirac equation. These mathematical paradoxes are resolved if the theory only employs amplitude states (real and virtual) with positive energies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics · Algebraic and Geometric Analysis · Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
