Impacts of Aggregation on Model Diversity and Consumer Utility
Kate Donahue, Manish Raghavan

TL;DR
This paper examines how aggregation impacts model diversity and consumer utility in AI marketplaces, proposing a new evaluation mechanism to incentivize better model specialization and improve overall consumer benefits.
Contribution
It introduces weighted winrate as a new incentive mechanism that promotes model diversity and consumer welfare, addressing limitations of standard winrate evaluations.
Findings
Weighted winrate incentivizes model specialization.
Homogenization occurs under standard winrate, reducing consumer utility.
Theoretical results extend to empirical benchmark datasets.
Abstract
Consider a marketplace of AI tools, each with slightly different strengths and weaknesses. By selecting the right model for the task at hand, a user can do better than simply committing to a single model for everything. Routers operate under a similar principle, where sophisticated model selection can increase overall performance. However, aggregation is often noisy, reflecting in imperfect user choices or routing decisions. This leads to two main questions: first, what does a "healthy marketplace" of models look like for maximizing consumer utility? Secondly, how can we incentivize producers to create such models? Here, we study two types of model changes: market entry (where an entirely new model is created and added to the set of available models), and model replacement (where an existing model has its strengths and weaknesses changed). We show that winrate, a standard benchmark in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
