Grasp, Slide, Roll: Comparative Analysis of Contact Modes for Tactile-Based Shape Reconstruction
Chung Hee Kim, Shivani Kamtikar, Tye Brady, Taskin Padir, Joshua Migdal

TL;DR
This paper compares different tactile contact modes for robotic shape reconstruction, demonstrating that finger-grazing and palm-rolling improve efficiency and accuracy, reducing interactions by 34% and increasing accuracy by 55%.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of contact modes combined with an information-theoretic exploration framework for tactile shape reconstruction.
Findings
Finger-grazing and palm-rolling improve reconstruction speed.
Reduced physical interactions by 34%.
Enhanced accuracy by 55%.
Abstract
Tactile sensing allows robots to gather detailed geometric information about objects through physical interaction, complementing vision-based approaches. However, efficiently acquiring useful tactile data remains challenging due to the time-consuming nature of physical contact and the need to strategically choose contact locations that maximize information gain while minimizing physical interactions. This paper studies how different contact modes affect object shape reconstruction using a tactile-enabled dexterous gripper. We compare three contact interaction modes: grasp-releasing, sliding induced by finger-grazing, and palm-rolling. These contact modes are combined with an information-theoretic exploration framework that guides subsequent sampling locations using a shape completion model. Our results show that the improved tactile sensing efficiency of finger-grazing and palm-rolling…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Robot Manipulation and Learning · Soft Robotics and Applications
