A note on the area under the likelihood and the fake evidence for model selection
L. Martino, F. Llorente

TL;DR
This paper explores the use of improper priors in a specific model selection context, introducing the concept of 'fake evidences' as areas under the likelihood, and discusses their properties and limitations through theoretical and numerical analysis.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of 'fake evidences' for model selection with improper priors and analyzes their behavior, especially the limitations of using diffuse priors to approximate these quantities.
Findings
Improper priors can be used for 'fake evidences' in certain model selection scenarios.
Increasing the scale of a diffuse prior does not recover the area under the likelihood.
Numerical experiments confirm theoretical insights about 'fake evidences'.
Abstract
Improper priors are not allowed for the computation of the Bayesian evidence (a.k.a., marginal likelihood), since in this case is not completely specified due to an arbitrary constant involved in the computation. However, in this work, we remark that they can be employed in a specific type of model selection problem: when we have several (possibly infinite) models belonging to the same parametric family (i.e., for tuning parameters of a parametric model). However, the quantities involved in this type of selection cannot be considered as Bayesian evidences: we suggest to use the name ``fake evidences'' (or ``areas under the likelihood'' in the case of uniform improper priors). We also show that, in this model selection scenario, using a diffuse prior and increasing its scale parameter asymptotically to infinity, we cannot recover the value of the area under the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
