CRAG: Can 3D Generative Models Help 3D Assembly?
Zeyu Jiang, Sihang Li, Siqi Tan, Chenyang Xu, Juexiao Zhang, Julia Galway-Witham, Xue Wang, Scott A. Williams, Radu Iovita, Chen Feng, Jing Zhang

TL;DR
CRAG introduces a novel joint approach to 3D assembly that combines shape generation and pose estimation, leading to improved handling of incomplete and complex objects.
Contribution
This work reformulates 3D assembly as a combined generation and assembly problem, enabling synthesis of missing geometry and better pose prediction.
Findings
Achieves state-of-the-art results on diverse 3D objects
Handles missing parts effectively
Outperforms prior pose estimation methods
Abstract
Most existing 3D assembly methods treat the problem as pure pose estimation, rearranging observed parts via rigid transformations. In contrast, human assembly naturally couples structural reasoning with holistic shape inference. Inspired by this intuition, we reformulate 3D assembly as a joint problem of assembly and generation. We show that these two processes are mutually reinforcing: assembly provides part-level structural priors for generation, while generation injects holistic shape context that resolves ambiguities in assembly. Unlike prior methods that cannot synthesize missing geometry, we propose CRAG, which simultaneously generates plausible complete shapes and predicts poses for input parts. Extensive experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art performance across in-the-wild objects with diverse geometries, varying part counts, and missing pieces. Our code and models will be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topics3D Shape Modeling and Analysis · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Robot Manipulation and Learning
