Hybrid Consensus with Quantum Sybil Resistance
Dar Gilboa, Siddhartha Jain, Or Sattath

TL;DR
This paper introduces a hybrid consensus protocol that leverages quantum position verification as a Sybil resistance mechanism, enhancing security and energy efficiency over traditional proof-of-work and proof-of-stake systems.
Contribution
It presents a novel hybrid consensus protocol combining classical methods with quantum position verification for Sybil resistance, achieving improved security and efficiency.
Findings
Provides a secure consensus protocol using quantum states as a scarce resource.
Achieves faster confirmation times than pure Proof-of-Work protocols.
Offers resilience against wealth concentration issues in Proof-of-Stake systems.
Abstract
Sybil resistance is a key requirement of decentralized consensus protocols. It is achieved by introducing a scarce resource (such as computational power, monetary stake, disk space, etc.), which prevents participants from costlessly creating multiple fake identities and hijacking the protocol. Quantum states are generically uncloneable, which suggests that they may serve naturally as an unconditionally scarce resource. In particular, uncloneability underlies quantum position-based cryptography, which is unachievable classically. We design a consensus protocol that combines classical hybrid consensus protocols with quantum position verification as the Sybil resistance mechanism, providing security in the standard model, and achieving improved energy efficiency compared to hybrid protocols based on Proof-of-Work. Our protocol inherits the benefits of other hybrid protocols, namely the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCryptography and Data Security · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Distributed systems and fault tolerance
