Some Simple Economics of AGI
Christian Catalini, Xiang Hui, Jane Wu

TL;DR
This paper models the transition to AGI as a race between decreasing automation costs and limited human verification capacity, emphasizing the need to scale verification to ensure safe and responsible AI deployment.
Contribution
It introduces a structural model of the AGI transition highlighting the importance of verification capacity and proposes a practical approach to scale oversight alongside AI capabilities.
Findings
Verification bottleneck limits AI deployment safety
Scaling verification can enable unbounded discovery
Current equilibrium is unstable without improved oversight
Abstract
For millennia, human cognition was the primary engine of progress on Earth. As AI decouples cognition from biology, the marginal cost of measurable execution falls to zero, absorbing any labor capturable by metrics--including creative, analytical, and innovative work. The binding constraint on growth is no longer intelligence but human verification bandwidth: the capacity to validate, audit, and underwrite responsibility when execution is abundant. We model the AGI transition as the collision of two racing cost curves: an exponentially decaying Cost to Automate and a biologically bottlenecked Cost to Verify. This structural asymmetry widens a Measurability Gap between what agents can execute and what humans can afford to verify. It also drives a shift from skill-biased to measurability-biased technical change. Rents migrate to verification-grade ground truth, cryptographic provenance,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems · Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
