How Do Inpainting Artifacts Propagate to Language?
Pratham Yashwante, Davit Abrahamyan, Shresth Grover, and Sukruth Rao

TL;DR
This paper investigates how artifacts from diffusion-based image inpainting influence language generation in vision-language models, revealing that reconstruction quality impacts captioning performance and model behavior.
Contribution
It introduces a diagnostic framework to analyze the effect of inpainting artifacts on downstream language tasks in multimodal models.
Findings
Reconstruction fidelity correlates with caption quality.
Inpainting artifacts cause layer-dependent changes in model behavior.
Visual artifacts systematically influence language generation.
Abstract
We study how visual artifacts introduced by diffusion-based inpainting affect language generation in vision-language models. We use a two-stage diagnostic setup in which masked image regions are reconstructed and then provided to captioning models, enabling controlled comparisons between captions generated from original and reconstructed inputs. Across multiple datasets, we analyze the relationship between reconstruction fidelity and downstream caption quality. We observe consistent associations between pixel-level and perceptual reconstruction metrics and both lexical and semantic captioning performance. Additional analysis of intermediate visual representations and attention patterns shows that inpainting artifacts lead to systematic, layer-dependent changes in model behavior. Together, these results provide a practical diagnostic framework for examining how visual reconstruction…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMultimodal Machine Learning Applications · Subtitles and Audiovisual Media · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
