Error-Controlled Borrowing from External Data Using Wasserstein Ambiguity Sets
Yui Kimura, Shu Tamano

TL;DR
This paper introduces BOND, a robust statistical framework that optimally calibrates external data borrowing in clinical trials using Wasserstein ambiguity sets, ensuring validity and efficiency even with distributional mismatches.
Contribution
BOND provides a novel, analytically tractable method for data borrowing calibration that guarantees error control and maximizes power, unifying and improving existing approaches.
Findings
BOND maintains nominal size under heterogeneity.
It achieves efficiency gains over standard methods.
Simulation and real trial validate its effectiveness.
Abstract
Incorporating external data can improve the efficiency of clinical trials, but distributional mismatches between current and external populations threaten the validity of inference. While numerous dynamic borrowing methods exist, the calibration of their borrowing parameters relies mainly on ad hoc, simulation-based tuning. To overcome this, we propose BOND (Borrowing under Optimal Nonparametric Distributional robustness), a framework that formalizes data noncommensurability through Wasserstein ambiguity sets centered at the current-trial distribution. By deriving sharp, closed-form bounds on the worst-case mean drift for both continuous and binary outcomes, we construct a distributionally robust, bias-corrected Wald statistic that ensures asymptotic type I error control uniformly over the ambiguity set. Importantly, BOND determines the optimal borrowing strength by maximizing a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference
