Examining and Addressing Barriers to Diversity in LLM-Generated Ideas
Yuting Deng, Melanie Brucks, Olivier Toubia

TL;DR
This paper investigates why LLMs produce less diverse ideas than humans, identifies underlying mechanisms, and proposes prompting strategies to enhance LLM idea diversity, ultimately outperforming human diversity in some cases.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical and empirical framework for understanding and addressing the mechanisms limiting LLM idea diversity, introducing targeted prompting interventions.
Findings
Chain-of-Thought prompting reduces fixation in LLMs.
Using diverse personas improves knowledge partitioning.
Combining interventions yields higher idea diversity than humans.
Abstract
Ideas generated by independent samples of humans tend to be more diverse than ideas generated from independent LLM samples, raising concerns that widespread reliance on LLMs could homogenize ideation and undermine innovation at a societal level. Drawing on cognitive psychology, we identify (both theoretically and empirically) two mechanisms undermining LLM idea diversity. First, at the individual level, LLMs exhibit fixation just as humans do, where early outputs constrain subsequent ideation. Second, at the collective level, LLMs aggregate knowledge into a unified distribution rather than exhibiting the knowledge partitioning inherent to human populations, where each person occupies a distinct region of the knowledge space. Through four studies, we demonstrate that targeted prompting interventions can address each mechanism independently: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting reduces…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpen Source Software Innovations · AI in Service Interactions · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
