A note on the conceptual problems on the Unruh effect
Hideyasu Yamashita

TL;DR
This paper examines the conceptual issues in Sewell's modular approach to the Unruh effect, highlighting unresolved problems despite its rigorous, model-independent framework based on advanced mathematical theorems.
Contribution
It critically analyzes Sewell's modular approach to the Unruh effect, identifying persistent conceptual problems within a rigorous, model-independent framework.
Findings
Several conceptual problems remain unresolved in Sewell's approach.
The modular approach's advantages include rigor and model-independence.
The paper emphasizes the need for further clarification of foundational issues.
Abstract
This brief note is written with a somewhat similar purpose to Earman's 2011 paper on the conceptual problems on the Unruh effect. However, we confine ourselves to Sewell's modular approach to the Unruh effect, which is based on the theorems of Tomita-Takesaki and Bisognano-Wichmann. This approach is rigorous, and has an advantage of being model-independent. However, we will see that a number of conceptual problems remain unsolved on this approach.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHolomorphic and Operator Theory · Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems · Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
