Right to History: A Sovereignty Kernel for Verifiable AI Agent Execution
Jing Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces the 'Right to History', a formalized, verifiable logging system for AI agents on personal hardware, ensuring tamper-evidence and compliance with emerging regulations.
Contribution
It proposes a new sovereignty kernel, PunkGo, that unifies audit logs, isolation, governance, and human approval for verifiable AI agent actions.
Findings
All invariants hold under adversarial testing.
Achieves sub-1.3 ms median action latency.
Supports ~400 actions/sec throughput.
Abstract
AI agents increasingly act on behalf of humans, yet no existing system provides a tamper-evident, independently verifiable record of what they did. As regulations such as the EU AI Act begin mandating automatic logging for high-risk AI systems, this gap carries concrete consequences -- especially for agents running on personal hardware, where no centralized provider controls the log. Extending Floridi's informational rights framework from data about individuals to actions performed on their behalf, this paper proposes the Right to History: the principle that individuals are entitled to a complete, verifiable record of every AI agent action on their own hardware. The paper formalizes this principle through five system invariants with structured proof sketches, and implements it in PunkGo, a Rust sovereignty kernel that unifies RFC 6962 Merkle tree audit logs, capability-based isolation,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
