Order Bounds for Hypergeometric and q-Hypergeometric Creative Telescoping
Hui Huang

TL;DR
This paper develops a unified framework for computing minimal order telescopers for hypergeometric and q-hypergeometric terms, providing new bounds and proofs for their existence and order.
Contribution
It introduces a new argument for the termination of the telescoping algorithm, establishing unified bounds and confirming the existence of minimal order telescopers.
Findings
Unified bounds for hypergeometric and q-hypergeometric telescopers
Proof of algorithm termination and telescoper existence
Improved upper bounds in the q-hypergeometric case
Abstract
Leveraging a general framework adapted from symbolic integration, a unified reduction-based algorithm for computing telescopers of minimal order for hypergeometric and q-hypergeometric terms has been recently developed. In this paper, we conduct a deeper exploration and put forth a new argument for the termination of the algorithm. This not only provides an independent proof of existence of telescopers, but also allows us to derive unified upper and lower bounds on the order of telescopers for hypergeometric terms and their q-analogues. Compared with known bounds in the literature, our bounds, in the hypergeometric case, are exactly the same as the tight ones obtained in 2016; while in the q-hypergeometric case, no lower bounds were known before, and our upper bound is sometimes better and never worse than the known one.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPolynomial and algebraic computation · Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques · Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
