Extension of the fusion power plant costing standard

TL;DR

This paper extends the fusion power plant costing framework by integrating probabilistic, safety, and financial analyses, enabling comprehensive and transparent cost assessments for fusion energy development.

Contribution

It introduces a driver-centric, probabilistic, safety-informed, and finance-parameterized extension to the existing fusion costing framework, enhancing its transparency and extensibility.

Findings

Developed a driver-specific cost-account development process.

Integrated probabilistic uncertainty modeling for costs.

Expanded macroeconomic and financial parameterization.

Abstract

This paper documents the work of the Clean Air Task Force (CATF) International Working Group (IWG) on Fusion Cost Analysis in 2024-2025, and the methodological extensions implemented in the CATF-supported branch of the pyFECONs fusion power-plant costing framework. Using the standards-aligned chart-of-accounts and physics-to-economics workflow established by ARPA-E. The IWG development reorganizes and deepens the framework around three architecture-defining cost-driver tracks for Magnetic Fusion Energy (MFE), Inertial Fusion Energy (IFE), and Magneto-Inertial Fusion Energy (MIFE). In particular, the generic driver placeholder in Account 22.1.3 is treated as a controlled swap-point and replaced by a full cost-account development for the dominant driver in each class, enabling auditable traceability from requirements and geometry to rolled-up plant costs. On top of this driver-centric foundation, we introduce a probabilistic costing layer that compounds materials price uncertainty, TRL-based maturity uncertainty, and learning-curve uncertainty into cost distributions. We then describe safety-informed costing that enumerates fusion-relevant hazards and maps mitigating systems, structures, and provisions into standardized accounts, together with scenario-parameterized regulatory and financial adders. Finally, we document expanded macroeconomic and finance parameterization and a value-metrics module that complements LCOE with investment and planning measures (NPV, IRR MIRR, revenue requirements, WACC-based annualization, and residual and follow-on value), all computed from the same COA-mapped outputs. Collectively, these additions convert a deterministic, standards-aligned costing backbone into an extensible analysis environment suitable for transparent sensitivity studies, uncertainty propagation, and safety- and finance-coupled interpretation of fusion pilot-plant and NOAK scenarios.