Where Should Robotaxis Operate? Strategic Network Design for Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel optimization framework for designing the operational road network for autonomous Mobility-on-Demand services, balancing infrastructure costs and service quality using real-world data from Manhattan.

Contribution

It formulates the joint network design and fleet routing problem as a mixed-integer program and develops a scalable column-generation algorithm with optimality guarantees.

Findings

Produces stable, interpretable subnetworks for AMoD operations.

Quantifies trade-offs between infrastructure investment and fleet efficiency.

Accommodates operational constraints like turn restrictions.

Abstract

The emergence of Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand (AMoD) services creates new opportunities to improve the efficiency and reliability of on-demand mobility systems. Unlike human-driven Mobility-on-Demand (MoD), AMoD enables fully centralized fleet control, but it also requires appropriate infrastructure, so that vehicles can operate safely only on a suitably instrumented subnetwork of the roads. Most existing AMoD research focuses on fleet control (matching, rebalancing, ridepooling) on a fixed road network and does not address the joint design of the service network and fleet capacity. In this paper, we formalize this strategic design problem as the Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Network Design Problem (AMoD-NDP), in which an operator selects an operation subnetwork and routes all passengers, subject to infrastructure and fleet constraints and route-level quality-of-service requirements. We propose a path-based mixed-integer formulation of the AMoD-NDP and develop a column-generation-based algorithm that scales to city-sized networks. The master problem optimizes over a restricted set of paths, while the pricing problem reduces to an elementary shortest path with resource constraints, solved exactly by a tailored label-correcting algorithm. The method provides an explicit certificate of the optimality gap and extends naturally to a robust counterpart under box uncertainty in travel times and demand. Using real-world data from Manhattan, New York City, we show that the framework produces stable and interpretable operation subnetworks, quantifies trade-offs between infrastructure investment and fleet time, and accommodates additional path-level constraints, such as limits on left turns as a proxy for operational risk. These results illustrate how the proposed approach can support strategic planning and policy analysis for future AMoD deployments.