Finite groups with many elements of the same order
Ryan McCulloch, Lee Tae Young

TL;DR
This paper investigates a conjecture about the solubility of finite groups with a majority of elements sharing the same order, providing counterexamples and conditions under which the conjecture holds or fails.
Contribution
It refutes the original conjecture, identifies specific cases where it holds, and determines bounds on element orders in non-soluble groups.
Findings
The conjecture fails in general, with counterexamples.
The conjecture holds when k is a prime power other than 2 or 3, or when k=2, 3, or 4.
For k=4, the sharp upper bound of element ratio in non-soluble groups is established.
Abstract
We study a conjecture by Deaconescu on the solubility of finite groups with claims that if more than half of the elements in a finite group has the same order , then the group is soluble. We show that the original conjecture fails by presenting some counterexamples. By restricting to a fixed , the conjecture may or may not hold depending on . We prove that if is a power of a prime other than or , or if or , then the conjecture holds, while it fails for many other choices of including all multiples of and which are larger than . For we also find the sharp upper bound of the ratio of elements of order in non-soluble groups. We also prove that for all , it is always possible to find a finite non-soluble group where at least of the elements have order .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
