A Comparative Analysis of Peer Support in Forum-based and Chat-based Mental Health Communities: Technical-Structural-Functional Model of Social Support
Han Li

TL;DR
This study compares forum-based and chat-based mental health communities, revealing how their technical structures influence the types of social support provided, with implications for designing effective online support platforms.
Contribution
Introduces a technical-structural-functional model of social support and systematically compares communication patterns in different online mental health communities.
Findings
Forums foster more informational and emotional support
Chats promote greater companionship among users
Network structure explains support type differences
Abstract
Online support communities have become vital spaces offering varied forms of support to individuals facing mental health challenges. Despite the proliferation of platforms with distinct technical structures, little is known about how these features shape support dynamics and the socio-technical mechanisms at play. This study introduces a technical-structural-functional model of social support and systematically compares communication network structures and support types in 20 forum-based and 20 chat-based mental health communities. Using supervised machine learning and social network analysis, we find that forum-based communities foster more informational and emotional support, whereas chat-based communities promote greater companionship. These patterns were partially explained by network structure: higher in-degree centralization in forums accounted for the prevalence of informational…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDigital Mental Health Interventions · Mental Health via Writing · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
