Structure-preserving Krylov Subspace Approximations for the Matrix Exponential of Hamiltonian Matrices: A Comparative Study
Peter Benner, Heike Fa{\ss}bender, Michel-Niklas Senn

TL;DR
This paper compares structure-preserving Krylov subspace methods for efficiently approximating matrix exponentials of large Hamiltonian matrices, crucial for exponential integrators in Hamiltonian systems.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of various structure-preserving Krylov methods, highlighting their accuracy, efficiency, and structure preservation capabilities.
Findings
J-orthogonal Krylov bases maintain Hamiltonian structure
Structure-preserving methods outperform standard Krylov methods in accuracy
Adaptive Krylov dimension selection improves computational efficiency
Abstract
We study structure-preserving Krylov subspace methods for approximating the matrix-vector products f(H)b, where H is a large Hamiltonian matrix and f denotes either the matrix exponential or the related phi-function. Such computations are central to exponential integrators for Hamiltonian systems. Standard Krylov methods generally destroy the Hamiltonian structure under projection, motivating the use of Krylov bases with J-orthogonal columns that yield Hamiltonian projected matrices and symplectic reduced exponentials. We compare several such structure-preserving Krylov methods on representative Hamiltonian test problems, focusing on accuracy, efficiency, and structure preservation, and briefly discuss adaptive strategies for selecting the Krylov subspace dimension.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMatrix Theory and Algorithms · Numerical methods for differential equations · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
