Bounds and Identification of Joint Probabilities of Potential Outcomes and Observed Variables under Monotonicity Assumptions
Naoya Hashimoto, Yuta Kawakami, Jin Tian

TL;DR
This paper develops new methods for bounding and identifying joint probabilities of potential outcomes in causal inference with discrete treatments and outcomes, using monotonicity assumptions and linear programming.
Contribution
It introduces novel monotonicity assumptions and formulates the bounding problem as a linear program, enabling partial identification and potential full identification of joint probabilities.
Findings
New bounds for joint probabilities under monotonicity
Linear programming approach for bounding problems
Numerical validation with real-world data
Abstract
Evaluating joint probabilities of potential outcomes and observed variables, and their linear combinations, is a fundamental challenge in causal inference. This paper addresses the bounding and identification of these probabilities in settings with discrete treatment and discrete ordinal outcome. We propose new families of monotonicity assumptions and formulate the bounding problem as a linear programming problem. We further introduce a new monotonicity assumption specifically to achieve identification. Finally, we present numerical experiments to validate our methods and demonstrate their application using real-world datasets.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
