The Geometry of Noise: Why Diffusion Models Don't Need Noise Conditioning
Mojtaba Sahraee-Ardakan, Mauricio Delbracio, Peyman Milanfar

TL;DR
This paper explains why noise-agnostic diffusion models can generate high-quality samples without explicit noise conditioning by analyzing their underlying energy landscape and stability properties.
Contribution
It formalizes the concept of Marginal Energy and shows how autonomous models implicitly perform Riemannian gradient flow, resolving paradoxes about stability and noise estimation.
Findings
Autonomous models perform Riemannian gradient flow on Marginal Energy.
Velocity-based parameterizations are inherently stable.
Identifies Jensen Gap as a cause of failure in noise-prediction models.
Abstract
Autonomous (noise-agnostic) generative models, such as Equilibrium Matching and blind diffusion, challenge the standard paradigm by learning a single, time-invariant vector field that operates without explicit noise-level conditioning. While recent work suggests that high-dimensional concentration allows these models to implicitly estimate noise levels from corrupted observations, a fundamental paradox remains: what is the underlying landscape being optimized when the noise level is treated as a random variable, and how can a bounded, noise-agnostic network remain stable near the data manifold where gradients typically diverge? We resolve this paradox by formalizing Marginal Energy, , where is the marginal density of the noisy data integrated over a prior distribution of unknown noise levels.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModel Reduction and Neural Networks · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
