A Marginal Reliability Impact Based Accreditation Framework for Capacity Markets
Feng Zhao, Tongxin Zheng, Dane Schiro, Xiaochu Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Marginal Reliability Impact (MRI) framework for capacity markets that aligns resource accreditation with reliability contribution, promoting substitutability and efficiency in resource valuation.
Contribution
It proposes a novel MRI-based accreditation method that enhances substitutability and accurately reflects reliability contributions in capacity markets.
Findings
MRI accreditation aligns resource value with reliability impact
Substitutability between resources and demand improves market efficiency
Framework better characterizes resource adequacy problems
Abstract
This paper presents a Marginal Reliability Impact (MRI) based resource accreditation framework for capacity market design. Under this framework, a resource is accredited based on its marginal impact on system reliability, thus aligning the resource accreditation value with its reliability contribution. A key feature of the MRI based accreditation is that the accredited capacities supplied by different resources to the capacity market are substitutable in reliability contribution, a desired feature of homogeneous products. Moreover, with MRI based capacity demand, substitutability between supply and demand for capacity is also achieved. As a result, a capacity market with the MRI based capacity product can better characterize the underlying resource adequacy problem and lead to more efficient market outcomes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPower System Reliability and Maintenance · Reliability and Maintenance Optimization · Evaluation and Optimization Models
