Visual Anthropomorphism Shifts Evaluations of Gendered AI Managers
Ruiqing Han, Hao Cui, Taha Yasseri

TL;DR
This study investigates how visual anthropomorphism influences gender bias in AI manager evaluations, revealing that facial cues activate gender stereotypes, unlike text descriptions where competence dominates.
Contribution
It demonstrates that representational modality affects gender bias in AI evaluations, showing visual cues evoke stereotypes absent in text-based assessments.
Findings
Competence cues reduce gender bias in text-based AI evaluations.
Facial anthropomorphism triggers gendered perceptions, especially with positive outcomes.
Negative feedback diminishes the influence of gender and competence cues.
Abstract
This research examines whether competence cues can reduce gender bias in evaluations of AI managers and whether these effects depend on how the AI is represented. Across two preregistered experiments (N = 2,505), each employing a 2 x 2 x 3 design manipulating AI gender, competence, and decision outcome, we compared text-based descriptions of AI managers with visually generated AI faces created using a reverse-correlation paradigm. In the text condition, evaluations were driven by competence rather than gender. When participants received unfavourable decisions, high-competence AI managers were judged as fairer, more competent, and better leaders than low-competence managers, regardless of AI gender. In contrast, when the AI manager was visually represented, competence cues had attenuated influence once facial information was present. Instead, participants showed systematic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · AI in Service Interactions
