Herd Behavior in Decentralized Balancing Models: A Case Study in Belgium
Max Bruninx, Seyed Soroush Karimi Madahi, Timothy Verstraeten, Jan Decuyper, Chris Develder, Jan Helsen

TL;DR
This paper investigates the impact of increased participation in decentralized balancing in Belgium, showing initial cost benefits but highlighting risks of overshoot with high capacity, and analyzing different pricing formulas.
Contribution
It develops a market simulator for Belgium's 2023 data to analyze implicit balancing effects and compares current and alternative price formulas.
Findings
Initial cost reductions from decentralized balancing
Overshoot risks increase with higher capacity participation
BRPs benefit from implicit balancing despite rising costs
Abstract
In a decentralized balancing model, Balance Responsible Parties (BRPs) are encouraged by the Transmission System Operator (TSO) to deviate from their schedule to help the system restore balance, also referred to as implicit balancing. This could reduce balancing costs for the grid operator and lower the entry barrier for flexible assets compared to explicit balancing services. However, these implicit reactions may overshoot when their total capacity is high, potentially requiring more explicit activations. This study analyses the effect of increased participation in the decentralized balancing model in Belgium. To this end, we develop a market simulator that produces price signals on minute-level and simulate the implicit reactions for battery assets with different risk profiles. Besides the current price formula, we also study two potential candidates for the near-term presented by the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
