Comparison of Pauli projection and supersymetric transformation methods for three-body nuclear structure and reactions
A. Deltuva

TL;DR
This paper compares two methods for handling Pauli-forbidden states in three-body nuclear calculations, analyzing their effectiveness in bound, resonant, and scattering states within a momentum-space framework.
Contribution
It provides a systematic comparison of Pauli projection and supersymmetric transformation methods for eliminating forbidden states in three-body nuclear systems.
Findings
The projection method aligns better with experimental data for deuteron-Helium-4 scattering.
No clear superiority of either method for bound and resonant states.
Systematic differences between the two approaches are identified.
Abstract
Three-body Faddeev-type equations for bound, resonant, and scattering states in the systems with a nuclear core and two nucleons are solved using the momentum-space framework. Two approaches for eliminating the Pauli-forbidden deeply-bound states are compared: projecting out those states by a nonlocal term in the potential, and by using a supersymmetric transformation of the potential. While the former method is preferred by the experimental data for the deuteron-{He} scattering, the results for bound and resonant states do not indicate a clear superiority of a single method. Instead, systematic differences between them are found.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNuclear physics research studies · Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics · Atomic and Molecular Physics
