General formalism, classification, and demystification of the current warp-drive spacetimes
Hamed Barzegar, Thomas Buchert, Quentin Vigneron

TL;DR
This paper critically analyzes warp-drive spacetimes within General Relativity, classifies models, corrects misconceptions, and proves new no-go theorems, showing the significant challenges to their physical viability.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive classification, formalism, and correction of misconceptions about warp-drive models, including new no-go theorems that challenge their feasibility.
Findings
Most warp-drive claims need reassessment under correct GR principles
Many models violate energy conditions or are physically implausible
The paper clarifies misconceptions and provides formal classifications
Abstract
We critically examine proposals for the so-called warp-drive spacetimes and classify these models based on their various restrictions within the framework of General Relativity. We then provide a summary of general formalism for each class, and in the process, we highlight some misconceptions, misunderstandings, and errors in the literature that have been used to support claims about the physicality and feasibility of these models. On the way, we prove several new no-go theorems. Our analysis shows that when the principles of General Relativity are applied correctly, most claims regarding physical warp drives must be reassessed, and it becomes highly challenging to justify or support the viability of such models, not merely due to the violation of energy conditions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
