TabAgent: A Framework for Replacing Agentic Generative Components with Tabular-Textual Classifiers
Ido Levy, Eilam Shapira, Yinon Goldshtein, Avi Yaeli, Nir Mashkif, Segev Shlomov

TL;DR
TabAgent introduces a framework that replaces slow, costly generative decision components in agentic systems with efficient, trained tabular-textual classifiers, significantly reducing latency and inference costs while maintaining performance.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel framework, TabAgent, for replacing generative decision modules with trained classifiers, improving efficiency in agentic systems.
Findings
Reduces latency by approximately 95%.
Cuts inference cost by 85-91%.
Maintains task success on AppWorld benchmark.
Abstract
Agentic systems, AI architectures that autonomously execute multi-step workflows to achieve complex goals, are often built using repeated large language model (LLM) calls for closed-set decision tasks such as routing, shortlisting, gating, and verification. While convenient, this design makes deployments slow and expensive due to cumulative latency and token usage. We propose TabAgent, a framework for replacing generative decision components in closed-set selection tasks with a compact textual-tabular classifier trained on execution traces. TabAgent (i) extracts structured schema, state, and dependency features from trajectories (TabSchema), (ii) augments coverage with schema-aligned synthetic supervision (TabSynth), and (iii) scores candidates with a lightweight classifier (TabHead). On the long-horizon AppWorld benchmark, TabAgent maintains task-level success while eliminating…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
- Strong motivation -- attempting the tackle the slowness problem in the current agent framework due to the LLM autoregressive token generation. - Clear design of the TabAgent framework, which is consist of constructing TabSchema from traces, synthesizing more training data with TabSynth, and training the TabHead classifier to replace expensive generative decision components. - Strong improvement in the efficiency of the agent framework, which achieves good performance while reducing the inferen
- What is the generalizability of to other tasks than AppWorld under the IBM CUGA agentic framework? - How flexible can TabAgent framework be adapted to another agent framework compared to the baselines? - What is the performance comparisons LLMs designed specifically for agentic usage? - What would be the benefit of TabAgent over fine-tuning small language models regarding to cost-effectiveness (https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02153)? - To what extend the TabAgent is reliant on GPT-4.1 for TabSchema
1. The motivation is very clear to me. 2. The evaluation are comprehensive and the results are convincing. This work tries to solve an important problem and they find an interesting perspective, no matter the results or the rationale, I think the novelty is already there. There are various results provided in the evaluation section and in the appedix, I appreciate these efforts.
1. The organization and clarity can be improved. 2. More insights are required to make it better to understand. My major concern about this work is the organization and clarity, but I believe these can be improved before submitting the camera-ready version. My detailed comments can be found below: 1. The description of TabSynth is very limited, there is no visulization for it and I'm not sure whether I understand this part, either. I wonder howw do you validate the quality of the data generate
1. **Practical Focus on Reducing Inference Cost in Agent Systems** The paper tackles a real bottleneck in deploying LLM-based agents at scale—high latency and cost from repeated generation. By proposing a discriminative alternative, it offers a concrete path toward more efficient agent execution. 2. **Modular and Reusable Framework Design** The TabAgent architecture is presented in a modular manner (TabSchema, TabSynth, TabHead), making it relatively straightforward to apply the same
See questions.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Data Classification · Business Process Modeling and Analysis · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
