Examining Fast Radiatively Driven Responses Using Machine-Learning Weather Emulators
Ankur Mahesh, William D. Collins, Travis A. O'Brien, Paul B. Goddard, Sinclaire Zebaze, Shashank Subramanian, James P.C. Duncan, Oliver Watt-Meyer, Boris Bonev, Thorsten Kurth, Karthik Kashinath, Michael S. Pritchard, Da Yang

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that machine-learning weather emulators trained on historical data can effectively simulate fast radiative feedback responses to greenhouse gas perturbations, aligning with full-physics Earth System Models.
Contribution
It shows that ML weather emulators trained on historical reanalyses can predict radiative feedbacks without retraining for future conditions.
Findings
ML emulators' responses agree with Earth System Models.
Fast precipitation responses to CO2 perturbations are captured.
Historical training suffices for studying radiative-convective equilibrium.
Abstract
The response of the climate system to increased greenhouse gases and other radiative perturbations is governed by a combination of fast and slow feedbacks. Slow feedbacks are typically activated in response to changes in ocean temperatures on decadal timescales and manifest as changes in climatic state with no recent historical analogue. However, fast feedbacks are activated in response to rapid atmospheric physical processes on weekly timescales, and they are already operative in the present-day climate. This distinction implies that the physics of fast radiative feedbacks is present in the historical meteorological reanalyses used to train many recent successful machine-learning-based (ML) emulators of weather and climate. In addition, these feedbacks are functional under the historical boundary conditions pertaining to the top-of-atmosphere radiative balance and sea-surface…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
