Finding Molecules with Specific Properties: Simulated Annealing vs. Evolution
Dominic Mashak, S.A. Alexander

TL;DR
This paper compares simulated annealing and evolutionary algorithms in optimizing molecules for high hyperpolarizability, demonstrating their comparable effectiveness in molecular design tasks.
Contribution
It provides a direct comparison of simulated annealing and evolutionary algorithms for molecular property optimization using SMILES representations.
Findings
Both methods are similarly effective in finding molecules with high hyperpolarizability.
The approaches are suitable for complex, realistic molecular design problems.
SMILES-based optimization is feasible with both algorithms.
Abstract
We compare the ability of a simulated annealing program and an evolutionary algorithm to find molecules with large molecular average hyperpolarizabilities. This property is an important component of nonlinear optical materials. Both optimization programs represent molecules as SMILES strings, a method that is widely used by chemists to describe molecular structure using short ASCII strings. Our results suggest that both approaches are comparable and can be used to solve a variety of more realistic problems of interest to chemists and material scientists.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNonlinear Optical Materials Research · Molecular spectroscopy and chirality · Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
