On the Lagarias Inequality and Superabundant Numbers
Andrew MacArevey

TL;DR
This paper investigates the Lagarias inequality related to the Riemann Hypothesis, demonstrating that potential counterexamples must be superabundant numbers, thus narrowing the search for violations.
Contribution
It introduces a continuous extension of harmonic numbers and proves the monotonicity of a related sequence, linking counterexamples to superabundant numbers.
Findings
The sequence B_n is strictly increasing for n ≥ 1.
Counterexamples to the Lagarias inequality, if any, are superabundant numbers.
Verification of the inequality on superabundant numbers suffices to test the hypothesis.
Abstract
We study the Lagarias inequality, an elementary criterion equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis. Using a continuous extension of the harmonic numbers, we show that the sequence is strictly increasing for . As a consequence, if the Lagarias inequality has counterexamples, then the least counterexample must be a superabundant number; equivalently, it suffices to verify the inequality on the superabundant numbers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic Number Theory Research · Mathematical Inequalities and Applications · Advanced Banach Space Theory
